Lesson 8/1080%
MODULE 08

Debugging Workflow & PCB Design

Every case study in Module 07 was solved with the same structured approach: narrow by frequency, isolate DM vs. CM, then fix the physical root cause. This module formalizes that decision tree and covers the PCB layout techniques that prevent most conducted-emission problems before they ever reach the lab.

Click through the tree below the way you would on the bench: start with the failing frequency, and let it point you toward differential-mode or common-mode causes.

Product failed CE test
150–500 kHz
>5 MHz
Likely Differential Mode
Likely Common Mode
This is a starting heuristic, not a guarantee -- always confirm with an actual DM/CM separation measurement (Module 02) before committing to a filter redesign, since real designs can have a dominant mode that doesn't match the "typical" frequency split.

Good and bad layout side by side for the four techniques that matter most for conducted (and radiated) emissions.

Animated: Good vs. Bad Switching Loop & Return Path

Technique Bad Practice Good Practice
Switching loop Input cap far from the switch node, sprawling hot loop Input cap immediately adjacent to the switch node, minimal loop area
Ground Split or slotted ground plane under switching traces Continuous, unbroken ground plane beneath all high-current paths
Return path Return current forced to detour around a slot or gap Return current follows directly beneath its forward trace
Filter placement Filter placed after noise has already spread across the board Filter placed immediately at the connector, before noise can spread
Via stitching No stitching vias between ground/power planes Dense stitching vias, especially near plane edges and connectors
KNOWLEDGE CHECK

Module 8 Quiz

Score: 0 / 10

Select the best answer for each question. Instant feedback is provided after each response.

Question 1 of 10